Thanks. This seems like good advice. Did the styloidectomy done in 2020 have a bad outcome you would say? Did it make any symptoms worse, or make the revision surgery harder?
The other reason to consider a styloidectomy alone (without the C1 shave) would be to not remove more bone/soft tissue than absolutely necessary, in case I was so lucky that a styloidectomy alone would fix the IJV compression. Maybe a non-realistic thought in my case though, not sure…
Well, to say I had a bad outcome from 1st surgery (styloidectomy alone) would be difficult to answer to a degree. To ignore IJV compression and potential for C1 involvement entirely I think is a disservice to patients. This is why I encourage you not to jump to the conclusion styloidectomy alone, especially with a surgeon who has little experience is not doing your due diligence. Learn from the patients whom came before you. It is reasonable to at a minimum explore IJV compression and C1 involvement with a surgeon (2nd opinion) who has expertise in identifying it. Ive learned enough recently to pull my scans into software and identify on my own to know it is an issue. My daughter just had scans last week and I can see it plain as day we have some serious issues. Having others here on this forum who have learned to identify these issues helped point me in the right direction. My bad outcome is that I had to go in for a revision because the job wasn’t down right the first time. That is never a good thing. I know scar tissue was encountered this revision surgery. Given I have hEDS and tend to lay down scar tissue and adhesions (something the 1st surgeon knew) is not a good thing either. You have the opportunity and choice to consult with a doc (may cost you $$$) who has experience identifying IJV compression and whether C1 is involved. It may not be an issue for you, by why go blindly into surgery w/o knowing this information? Until you have all the information you need, you are making decisions or considering “what if’s” “not sure” without all the information you need to make an educated decision.
Is it correct understood then, that if you have had the 2nd surgery in the first place instead, then you wouldn’t have had as many issues you reckon?
I figured I would use the free online consultation with Dr. Kamran Aghayev at least, but I just figured it seems that he always advice people to remove the C1 tubercle when the IJV is involved.
Additionally, I would probably pay the maybe 400dollars to consult with Dr. Patrick Axon (experiences London surgeon) before taking the final decision.
If you have any thoughts on my scans I’m also interested (even though your not a doctor, I know)
Pictures in the top of this thread (also check out Dropbox link CTV scan videos if you want:)
Still very interested in your thoughts, so I have to share:
I contacted the hospital with the two most experienced surgeons in my country (transcervical approach) with questions. They looked at my case and are both not entirely convinced that my symptoms are caused by the vascular component, but they believe that I will likely benefit from surgery in any case. They also wrote that: “your symptoms may also ‘only’ be due to Eagle’s syndrome without the vascular component. In the case of such a long styloid process, we would remove it externally, and we usually go up to the skull base and remove it completely. We use a nerve stimulator/monitoring during the procedure.”
I guess that is a pretty good start, even though the 2 surgeons in question has probably only done 3 transcervical styloidectomies each, but are both very experienced in generel doing surgeries in the neck area. They want to schedule an appointment and talk about things, probably offering the styloidectomy.
Before taking any decisions I still plan on having a online consult with at least Dr. Kamran to see if he feels absolutely certain that C1 resection is necessary. Maybe also Dr. Axon.
Yeah, why not fix it right the first time around? It as a job half done.
You would do yourself right by paying the $400 for Dr. Axon consult. Thats a bargain compared to what they cost now in the states as cash pay. Sounds like you are on the right track to get some decent opinions before you jump.
I didn’t look at your scans real closely but will. On the surface, Im not so sure you can get away without doing a C1 shave. There appears to be some significant compressions in there. The narrowing of the veins is very apparent visually.
@IJVman - It’s great that the two surgeons do transcervical surgeries w/ nerve monitoring & cut the styloids as close to the skull base as possible. Would you mind sharing their names with us so I can put them on our Doctors List as possible help for others who may join from your country?
I agree w/ what @Snapple2020 said i.e. that getting Mr. Axon & Dr. Aghayev’s opinions would be worthwhile before committing to surgery with either of the surgeons you’ve already spoken to in your country. Though they sound like they’d do a great job w/ your styloids, I have to agree that your C1 transverse processes look quite involved in your IJV compression. I also think it would be good for you to meet w/ your local surgeons to show them your 3D images & ask them why they think a styloidectomy(ies) alone would relieve your symptoms when you have clear IJV compression which is known to create IH & symptoms from that. We have a number of medical research papers in our Research Paper section which address IJV compression & the awful symptoms it causes & the positive results that occur once the IJV(s) are decompressed. You could print a couple of those, especially ones where symptoms like yours are presented, to take with you to your appointment.
Yes, I will definitely talk with others before surgery - thanks for stressing that point
And thanks for sharing research papers. I was actually about to ask for specific research papers that could work as proof for the IJV-compression subtype even exists which noone in Denmark seems to know. The problem might be that they have never seen it, probably never seen the research, and don’t actually believe that IJV compression can lead to symptoms, as the collaterals is securing the drainage from the brain (this is what the latest “specilist” neurologist said and wrote in my journal - he simply didn’t buy in on the premise even though he agreed that my IJV was compressed).
Is there a couple of the research papers that are your go-to “proof” that stylo-atlanto jugular vein compression exists and can cause issues like headache/brainfog/pressure?
@Jules linked this earlier, but is doesn’t really give hard proof that it exists. For one the authors group the artery and jugular vein subtype together under “vascular”, and when listing the symptoms stemming from jugular vein compression they refer to 1 case study (Farina et al., 2021) and symptoms I don’t really have.
Is there any go-to paper to use instead perhaps, that the surgeons can’t ignore?
Thanks
Haven’t had that no - not sure if i see any reason to either?
None of the doctors disputes that my IJV’s are compressed - they only dispute that it would lead to symptoms, as a lot of people has compressed IJV’s…
Ah, but would it show anything else than the IJV pressure gradient? Or would it also show whether the collaterals actually are providing sufficient drainage? Because if the latter is the case, then I guess it makes sense!
Summary (in English, including flow velocities):
Ultrasound of the neck and intracranial arteries shows normal findings, with normal blood flow in the carotid, vertebral, and basilar arteries on both sides. Flow remains stable during head rotation.
Anyways, here is what the neurologist doing the ultrasound wrote in my journal:
“”“”"
The jugular veins on both sides appear relatively narrow in a neutral head position but increase in size and flow when the head is turned:
Right jugular vein:
~70 cm/s in neutral position
~123 cm/s when turning head to the left
Left jugular vein:
~52 cm/s in neutral position
~98 cm/s when turning head to the right
The significance of these changes is uncertain. No abnormalities were found in intracranial circulation.
“”“”"
Is this the same info that a IR venogram with manometry would provide?
Thanks
IR venogram with manometry measures the actual pressure of the blood flow before the stenosis and after the stenosis at various points in the brain identifying pressure changes across the stenosis, not the size of the vessels. it is also done dynamically (with head position change) and shows where blood is flowing into collateral veins.
@IJVman - I’m assuming the results you listed above re: L & R IJV blood flow rates are from an ultrasound. Dr. Hepworth has said that any velocity over 50 cm/s along the course of the vein is indicative of IJV compression. Since both of your IJVs have flow rates higher than 50 cm/s, it can tentatively be concluded that you have bilateral compression which your imaging also shows.
I don’t know if there’s a way to show that the collaterals are providing adequate drainage via some type of scan or venogram. The mere fact of their existence demonstrates the IJV(s) need help (aren’t draining adequately) & the fact that the collaterals themselves can cause pain at the skull base, in the neck or back of the head is indicative that they’re doing a job they’re not supposed to be doing. Not only that but if the collaterals were doing the job of the IJVs, a person wouldn’t have the symptoms of IH & the offshoots of that such as brain fog, visual changes, tinnitus/pulsatile tinnitus.
I had significant skull base pain for several years after my styloidectomies & just figured I had a nerve that didn’t heal post op. Then I found out I had IJV compression & the pain in my occiput was coming from the collaterals that had developed. It’s gone now that IJV has been decompressed. I realize you haven’t specifically noted occipital pain, but I think the collaterals also contribute to the headaches that IJV compression causes because they can’t drain the brain as efficiently as the jugulars themselves can.
I think this is an ambiguous statement. It’s unlikely both IJVs increase in size when your head is turned. I would expect the right one increases when your head is turned left & left increases when head is turned right which means there is even greater compression in the contralateral IJV w/ right/left head turning.
Agree - unfortunately the neurologist didn’t at all agree with the whole premise of IJV compression syndrome even existing… So that was a pretty terrible experience to be honest. He made me sound like an idiot for even suggesting that this could be a problem.
This is super interesting!! Actually, in the course of the last years (before I knew eagle syndrome existed) I’ve had periods (many month) where occipital pain was the main focus for me. I even tried Botox and Greater occipital nerve corticosteroid injections (GON block) in due to the character of the pain earlier. My occipital nerves seemed very sensitive to cold water and wind. A couple of years ago the pain in generel seemed much more directly related to nerves. I even read alot about a device “Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS)”, but as neither the Botox or GON block did anything, I quit the idea obviously.
I’m not sure if it’s the medicine or time (and maybe the now-compensating collaterals) that has made the pain more “simple” / just like a generel annoying pressure headache/brain fog that seems related to the styloid/atlas area. Maybe my nerves has just gotten used to the constant irritation, who knows. I’m still sensitive to cold however, and both cold wind/cold water can give local flareup around the occipital nerves on the back of the head it seems.
You are absolutely right (which is confirmed by the CTV), which I tried to explain him but he cut me off.
When turning the head, it was only possible to examine the opposite side of the neck because the probe could not be placed properly on the same side due to the jaw blocking access. So the right IJV was assessed when turning the head left, and the left IJV when turning right.
In other words: flow in the contralateral IJV increases during head rotation:
Right internal jugular vein:
~70 cm/s in neutral position
~123 cm/s during leftward head rotation
Left internal jugular vein:
~52 cm/s in neutral position
~98 cm/s during rightward head rotation
In picture 4 (right side of head, head rotated to the right) it is obvious that the right IJV is still cut off, but this is exactly what the neurologist couldn’t access with the probe.
Well, just my opinion…this is outside the wheelhouse of a neurologist. Ive already gone to blows with 2 neurosurgeons in the US about this. They couldn’t think outside their little box. There is still is not alot of acceptance by the medical community on this whole IJV compression/ Eagles thing. Can we post Dr. H’s US protocol that others can take to Ultrasound techs to follow?
I’m sorry that the neurologist fobbed you off about the IJV compression, it’s frustrating if this affects your treatment in your country, but it looks like you do have this, and hopefully when you’ve had a consultation with Dr Aghayev, and perhaps Mr Axon, then you can decide the right path forward…
I actually just got a 10 minutes video from Dr. Kamran looking on my CTvenogram. He said that I need styloidectomy+C1 shave as expected.
The only surprise was what he said about the collaterals → “I have never seen in my life to that extend” in his words. Also noted how “engorged” the collaterals between C1 and occiput are (which @Isaiah_40_31 also commented in the pictures with the green circles). Allegedly “probably the most dramatic Eagle plus jugular compression syndrome I’ve seen in my life”.
I talked with the assistant also who was very kind. At the moment I’m definitely afraid that a styloidectomy will not be enough, and apparently a revision surgery is also 40% more expensive due to scar tissue and the need for nerve monitoring (because they can’t know where the nerves are located if there has been prior surgery). When it is not revision surgery (and when the carotid artery is not involved) they apparently don’t do specific nerve monitoring. They accept some irritation of the nerves, which will go away within a week allegedly.
Right now - especially with the extra potentielt cost for revision - it seems like a better idea to go straight abroad instead of trying a styloidectomy for free first.
Yes, agreed. There is only one you, and nothing else matters right now more than getting this addressed correctly the first time. Since Dr. Kamran is already recognizing compression and collateral patterns to that extent, I personally would not gamble on an incomplete first surgery just because it is “free.” You deserve the best chance at a definitive decompression from the start.
Please do keep us posted after surgery. I find too often people leave the site once they are treated, and those experiences are incredibly valuable for others still trying to navigate this. Prior to finding Dr. Osborne, I was pretty certain I would be traveling to Turkey for Dr. Kamran’s help myself. Although my styloids have been removed and I am recovering, there are still outstanding issues that likely only a neurosurgeon can address, and he is on my list of next steps.