My CTA looks kind of normal, too, and the report didn't see anything with the arterial side of things. My other CT scan DID show compression, though.
Did you get a copy of the CD?
This scan sounds like it might be the kind that is done to show the images of the arteries, not so much the bony images? It would be like looking at the wiring of your house without the structure of the house showing up....just the wires. I don't know if they got detailed bony images on your scan, it's hard to tell by what was written, and because I don't know what is included in CTAs.
The rad writes about mild elongation (but no measurement- I realllllly wish there was a measurement here- and a slight curving inward of your styloid process) I know you got a 3D done, but I think that was of the arterial flow....not sure, again, if bony images were included in that. I wonder about the veinous flow, too. I wonder how much of that could be seen.
'without significant stenosis' in the extracranial arteries (I think that means just next to your skull, up where the styloid process would be affecting them). Does that mean there is some stenosis? Not sure. I wonder about that because my rad report of CTA says I have NO stenosis there. If you have some stenosis in this one position, maybe it's greater in other positions.
Like BigsBug said, this is in one position...laying down. I know that you had said that some of your symptoms were positional. You also have a contradicting report from the other doc about the length of the styloids...I'm really curious about that. I'd really try to pin someone down to a measurement from these images. I hope you can get someone to do that for you.
I had a pretty normal report on my CTA, too...similar to yours... Yet my doc found my other scans (CT and MRI) to be abnormal enough to discuss at a meeting of head and neck surgeons.
Sorry this report was not definitive for your condition... this time.
You're going to find something, it's just a matter of WHEN.
I wonder what part your neck plays in this. He used the word 'severe' when writing about the stenosis of the spinal canal. That caught my attention.
I like the idea of you seeing Dr Samji, too. What about taking these images to your first doc who wrote about the 50mm length?